Streetwise Professor

January 10, 2013

Where’s Stanley Kowalski When You Need Him?

Filed under: Commodities,Derivatives,Economics,Energy,Financial crisis,Politics,Regulation — The Professor @ 8:30 pm

The US Senate s sometimes called the World’s Greatest Deliberative Body.  At times-most times, in fact-it seems that it would be more apt to call it the Deliberative Body With the World’s Greatest Proportion of Room Temperature IQs.  Many notable dimwits come to mind-Barbara Boxer, for instance. But the dearly departed (from the Senate, anyways) Blanche Lincoln was oh-so-special in her dimness.

As a sort of parting gift prior to her electoral rout in 2010, Blanche succeeded in inserting the eponymous Lincoln Amendment into Frankendodd.  This was the “swaps push out” provision, which precluded any “swaps entity” from receiving assistance from the Federal Reserve.  This requires banks to “push out” dealing in derivatives to separately capitalized subsidiaries that have no access to the Fed discount window, or other sources of federal support.

Crucially, the Lincoln Amendment was limited: basically, only equity derivatives, some credit derivatives, and commodity derivatives (with the exception of gold) were pushed out.  Banks were allowed to maintain their bread-and-butter rates derivatives business, as well as some of their credit trading businesses.  I guess the theory was that commodities are scary risky, but banks can’t jeopardize themselves by playing in interest rates.  Or something.

Well, that’s true of US banks, anyways.  But due to the meticulous drafting that characterizes Frankendodd, branches of foreign banks cannot avail themselves of the same exemptions.  This includes behemoths like Barclays and Deutsche Bank.

So now the Fed is trying to clean up after Congress, endeavoring to find ways to blunt the effects the provisions of the Lincoln Amendment on foreign banks.  Easier said than done, because despite the fact that “Ms Lincoln called her amendment’s treatment of foreign banks’ uninsured US branches a ‘significant oversight’ that was “unfortunate and clearly unintended. . . . the language of the legislation is clear, regulators are unable to use [Lincoln’s] statements on the Senate floor to unilaterally change the implementation of the law. ”

Good times.  Good times. Just another of the land mines lurking in Frankendodd.  Think of how many more are to be found.  And how many are buried in Obamacare.

Like I said.  Good times.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


  1. The shining city on the hill is suffering from a brownout do to these dim bulbs soon to be a blackout when the EPA shuts down the power plant and the DOJ confiscates flashlights from civilians since they are used by criminals.

    You are right-hard to imagine what lunacy has been included and how many back door sweet deal scams for those in the know.

    Comment by pahoben — January 11, 2013 @ 8:58 pm

  2. And yet, the dim bulbs are re-elected to multiple terms because they’re “likeable” or “just like us”.. It’s depressing to think that means we’re just like them…

    Comment by dh — January 12, 2013 @ 10:41 pm

  3. @dh-the only thing I can think of to escape your depressing observation on this depressed Monday morning is that I didn’t vote for the dimmest of the lot. On many ballots for federal office all the choices are a filament shy of full output. It then becomes a regress because how did they get on the ballot if not because they appealed to a large swath of the voters. Two ways it muight be fixed are-
    1) Voting is limited to net taxpayers or those with military service
    2) All candidates for federal office are required to pass a difficult qualification exam

    Can you believe it was the Republican Party that by and large passed the Nineteenth Amendment?

    Comment by pahoben — January 14, 2013 @ 7:26 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress