Streetwise Professor

March 2, 2015

True Genius, or Sputtering Incoherence?

Filed under: History,Military,Politics — The Professor @ 6:06 pm

F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote that “[t]he test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.” By this standard, Obama and his foreign policy team must be far into the right tail of the MENSA distribution, because they are able to hold about 10 opposed ideas in mind.

For instance, the operation against Tikrit is a vital step in the campaign against Isis, but the US is not involved. In part it is not involved because Iran and Shia militias are taking the lead in the offensive there, and the US has grave, grave concerns about growing Iranian influence-control, really-in Iraq and elsewhere in the region (e.g., Yemen). We are so concerned about Iran, in fact, that we are negotiating-I use the term loosely, because it usually involves both give and take, and we are just giving-a deal that would give Iran a clear path to becoming a nuclear power. Once it becomes a nuclear power, of course, it will have dramatically enhanced capability to exert its power in the entire Middle East. Even before it gets the bomb, sanctions will be ended, giving Iran the economic wherewithal to support terrorism and extend its influence the region. (Kerry is in Geneva with his buddy, the Iranian foreign minister Javad. They’re on a first name basis, you see. I wonder if they’re reminiscing about the old days. You know, the American Embassy; the Marine Barracks; Khobar Towers; supplying Iraqi terrorists with shaped charge IEDs to kill Americans. Good times. Good times. The list of topics is endless.)

Meanwhile, Obama has long said that he wants to rid the world of nuclear weapons. Not only is he negotiating a deal that will create a new nuclear power, Iran’s acquisition of the bomb will set off a race by the Saudis, Turks, Egyptians, etc., to get it too.

Further, Obama wants to get the Sunnis in Iraq, and Sunni nations in the Middle East, on board to fight Isis. All the while he is standing aside while Iran and Shia militias, whom the Sunnis hate with the heat of 1000 suns, operate pretty much at will in Iraq.

But I’m not done!  The administration also has a soft spot for the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood (witness its continued hostility to Sisi in Egypt, who tossed out the MB), despite the fact that the Brotherhood views Shia as subhuman.

Another part of the administration policy-supposedly-is to support “moderate” Syrian opposition fighters. Who is the opposition opposed to? Iran’s biggest ally: Assad. What’s more, the first group of fighters that we were supporting were rolled over by an Al Qaeda-linked group, and switched allegiances. In response, Obama’s “Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL” (how does he fit that on his business card?) Gen. John Allen (ret.), says that the US will protect moderate Syrian opposition fighters “when the time comes.” I’ll bet that’s a real enticement to enlist. Somehow, I get the vision that the protection that will be offered is an honor guard at a mass burial, because when the time comes it will be too late.

Of course, this is not genius. It is drooling incoherence. The administration has more foreign policy personalities than Sybil. Simultaneously attempting to pursue wildly contradictory, and indeed mutually exclusive, policies, which will inevitably result in a train wreck of historic proportions.

At the root of this is Obama’s Ahab-like pursuit of a deal with Iran. That is the primary source of incoherence. Why he harbors this obsession, I do not know. I cannot think of a good reason. I can think of many bad ones, including some very, very bad ones.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

6 Comments »

  1. Ah, it’ll all be well when Hils is in the WH and hits the RESET button.

    Comment by The Pilot — March 2, 2015 @ 9:10 pm

  2. go on – what are the very, very bad reasons you think the President is pursuing a deal with Iran?

    Comment by thoreau devotee — March 2, 2015 @ 9:25 pm

  3. @Pilot-Yeah, and while Hillary is furiously pressing the Reset button, Khamenei will be pushing the launch button.

    The ProfessorComment by The Professor — March 2, 2015 @ 10:14 pm

  4. You do recall that Valery Jarrett, the president behind the president, is Iranian.

    Comment by Jon Sanders — March 2, 2015 @ 10:40 pm

  5. @Jon-American parents. She lived in Iran until she was 5, and she thinks that makes her a fucking expert on the place. Just like Obama thinks that living in Indonesia eating dog for a couple years as a kid makes him an expert on Islamic countries.

    The ProfessorComment by The Professor — March 2, 2015 @ 10:50 pm

  6. Gentlemen:

    Pls watch the ‘hate’ speech. The internet is now regulated for content, by the lily-white, pure, innocent, Holy, & unbiased bureaucrats at the FCC & NSA.

    Please, …. for the children. [Haven’t heard that bromide in awhile.]

    VP VVP

    Comment by Vlad — March 3, 2015 @ 10:25 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress