Streetwise Professor

March 24, 2022

The London Mulligan Exchange

Filed under: China,Clearing,Commodities,Derivatives,Economics,Regulation — cpirrong @ 3:58 pm

The LME restarted trading of nickel. Well, sort of. In the first five sessions prices were limit down, and trading stopped as soon as the limits were hit. The LME deemed two subsequent sessions “disrupted” and declared the trades in these sessions “null and void.”

In other words: more mulligans after the trade cancellations that followed the spike to $100K/tonne prices. The LME should change its name to the London Mulligan Exchange. Which is not a good look.

Departing LME CEO Matthew Chamberlain tried to shift blame last week, claiming that the problem was that the exchange did not have visibility into risk due to the fact that approximately 80 percent of Tsingshan’s nickel position was in the form of OTC trades with big banks, such as JP Morgan. This is weak excuse. It is highly likely that the banks hedged their Tsingshan exposure on the LME, so the exchange saw the positions, but just didn’t know for sure exactly who was behind them. But the LME has known for months (years actually) that Tsingshan was the elephant in the nickel ring, and that the banks who were short the LME were almost certainly hedging an OTC exposure. The LME should have been able to add two and two.

The price increases today and in the previous session suggest that the short covering is ongoing, and that the “I’m going to hang on to my position” rhetoric from Tsingshan, and the insinuations that the banks were allowing it to extend and pretend, are therefore not correct. It (and perhaps other shorts) are trying to reduce positions. Continued gyrations are therefore likely, and a default that would make recent “disruptions” look like child’s play is not out of the question. The fear of this is likely what is causing the LME to take actions (voiding trades) that only further blacken its already dusky reputation. To a fox caught in a trap, chewing off a leg is the best option.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 Comments »

  1. Another exchange ought to list nickel. I don’t know what it takes to get physical delivery, or how long the CFTC process would take but the LME has ceased to be a transparent price discovery marketplace.

    Comment by Jeffrey Carter — March 24, 2022 @ 5:34 pm

  2. This was truly pathetic: it reminds me of my late mother who said she was married 3x.

    Actually 4, she gave herself a pass on the first because she was young, and it only lasted 9 months.

    I didn’t think it was possible, but compared to this the behavior of the NYMEX silver market governance 12/78-2/80 may not deserve sainthood, but certainly a beatification!

    Comment by Sotosy1 — April 20, 2022 @ 11:31 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress