To the NYT It Would Be News That Socialism Causes Economic Catastrophe
Venezuela is on the verge of economic collapse and social disintegration. Here’s the NYT’s diagnosis:
The growing economic crisis — fueled by low prices for oil, the country’s main export; a drought that has crippled Venezuela’s ability to generate hydroelectric power; and a long decline in manufacturing and agricultural production — has turned into an intensely political one for President Nicolás Maduro. This month, he declared a state of emergency, his second this year, and ordered military exercises, citing foreign threats.
Do you see what’s missing? Not a single mention of socialism, Chavism, Bolivarian socialism, etc.
Other countries have suffered similar shocks without descending into dystopian chaos like Venezuela. Many countries in South America, for instance (notably Columbia and Brazil), have suffered from the decline in commodity prices and the drought, and are doing poorly economically, but are not plagued by empty store shelves, myriad shuttered factories and stores, and the imminent threat of social violence. Brazil has suffered from a lack of hydropower due to the drought, but has imported LNG to keep the lights on. Venezuela can’t afford to.
Further, Venezuela’s descent into catastrophe started long ago, and serious problems were clearly manifest in 2014 and before when the price of oil was over $100/bbl and the drought had not reduced hydropower output.
Venezuela’s current crisis had its roots with Chavez’s triumph in the 2002-2003 general strike, and the subsequent firing of 18,000 PDVSA employees. In the years that followed, foreign investors were expropriated, as were domestic businesses, all in the name of socialism. The government has imposed price controls on an every widening array of goods. As shortages increased and inflation spiked, the government increased the scope of price controls and enforced them in a draconian way, including through the dispatching of red shirted goons to seize offending businesses.
The results of all this should have been eminently predictable: shortages and a collapse of economic activity. It is those policies that caused the “long decline in manufacturing and agricultural production.”
Venezuela is one of the world’s top oil producers at a time of soaring energy prices [hahaha], yet shortages of staples like milk, meat and toilet paper are a chronic part of life here, often turning grocery shopping into a hit or miss proposition.
Some residents arrange their calendars around the once-a-week deliveries made to government-subsidized stores like this one, lining up before dawn to buy a single frozen chicken before the stock runs out. Or a couple of bags of flour. Or a bottle of cooking oil. (Emphasis added.)
Mind well the date of the article: April 21, 2012. Four years ago. When the Brent price was about $118/bbl.
This title of the NYT piece is hilarious: “With Venezuelan Food Shortages, Some Blame Price Controls.”
Hey, NYT: by “some” do you mean people with an economics IQ of above 80? (A category which would exclude the editorial staff and most of the news room.)
What is happening in Venezuela is a perfect illustration of something that Adam Smith recognized 240 years ago. It takes perverse government policy to turn an adverse supply or demand shock into shortages and economic catastrophe:
Whoever examines with attention the history of the dearths and famines which have afflicted any part of Europe, during either the course of the present or that of the two preceding centuries, of several of which we have pretty exact accounts, will find, I believe, that a dearth never has arisen from any combination among the inland dealers in corn, nor from any other cause but a real scarcity, occasioned sometimes perhaps, and in some particular places, by the waste of war, but in by far the greatest number of cases by the fault of the seasons; and that a famine has never arisen from any other cause but the violence of government attempting, by improper means, to remedy the inconveniences of a dearth. (Emphasis added.)
That is a perfect description of what is happening in Venezuela.
But various economic morons on the left (but I repeat myself) like Bernie Sanders, Jeremy Corbyn, Sean Penn, and Danny Glover (to name just a few) have been cheering Chavism and Bolivarian socialism for attacking the inequalities spawned by capitalism red in tooth and claw. In a perverse way, it has indeed succeeded in reducing inequality–by making everyone largely equal in their abject misery.
Perhaps there is a silver lining to the food shortages. They reduce the need for toilet paper, which ran out long ago (due to price controls, naturally).
The New York Times prides itself on carrying all the news that’s fit to print. Apparently the news about the impact of price controls hasn’t reached it yet, even though observant folks picked up on it about the time of Diolcetian’s Edict on Prices, a mere 1715 years ago.
This economic cluelessness by the NYT is precisely why its criticism of me doesn’t bother me. Such boundless economic ignorance (which is shared by a vast swathe of its readers, including notably Elizabeth Warren) renders its criticism meaningless. Anyone so stupid, or so ideologically blinded, that they fail to recognize that Venezuela’s problems have everything to do with perverse government policy has nothing to say about economics that is worth paying the slightest heed.
Don’t forget Stiglitz cheering the absence of excessive Central Bank independence back in 2007.
Comment by Krzys — May 29, 2016 @ 11:08 pm
Hey Craig – Excellent post. Thought you might like the below article, which references many people’s inability/unwillingness to comprehend Hayek’s extended order. Hope all is well with you, Matt
http://capx.co/socialism-and-self-delusion/
Comment by Matt Jacobs — May 31, 2016 @ 7:15 pm
How ironic-the Times mentioning a toilet paper shortage.
The human mind may have a philosophical predilection for socialism but in practice the human mind detests socialism.
Comment by pahoben — June 1, 2016 @ 2:35 pm
@pahoben-To demonstrate solidarity with their leftist comrades, the NYT should ship its paper to Venezuela so the TP-deprived can put itto an appropriate use. Certainly far more value created that way than by, say, reading it.
All the Poop That’s Fit to Scoop works better on multiple levels and of course The Brown Lady for wider inclusion.
Comment by pahoben — June 3, 2016 @ 9:16 am
Enjoyed the reminder about how well Adam Smith could express such simple but insightful ideas.
Comment by Traveller — June 8, 2016 @ 11:17 pm
And what do you call it when a population declines 25% in the 25 years since the end of Socialism and the beginning of FreeMarketDemocratic Reform? Or where there are now half as many children as there were when FreeMarketDemocraticReform began?
Success, obviously, for those whose First Principle is “All for Ourselves and nothing for Other People.”
Comment by rkka — June 11, 2016 @ 6:50 am